<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are We Really Glad To See Danica Go?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/</link>
	<description>Speed is Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indygrrrl</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Indygrrrl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that her behavior has not been any different than other athletes, but when the entire focus is on your behavior, not your accomplishments--is that being a really a good ambassador for the sport hat you supposedly love. The other sports (football, basketball, etc.) have many people in the spotlight--good, bad and ugly. BUT when you are the main person in the media spotlight, is this behavior acceptable? I won&#039;t be sorry to see her go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that her behavior has not been any different than other athletes, but when the entire focus is on your behavior, not your accomplishments&#8211;is that being a really a good ambassador for the sport hat you supposedly love. The other sports (football, basketball, etc.) have many people in the spotlight&#8211;good, bad and ugly. BUT when you are the main person in the media spotlight, is this behavior acceptable? I won&#8217;t be sorry to see her go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.M.H.</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.M.H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 19:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I&#039;m doing is pointing out the problem in George&#039;s argument. Normally he&#039;s solid, and I agree with him on most things. As is evidenced by previous comments I&#039;ve made here. But here, on this one thing, there&#039;s a definite double standard going. He didn&#039;t try making the argument that &quot;winning excuses bratty behavior&quot; until  someone here dissented, and yes, to be logically consistent, that should have been spelled out. It&#039;s normally understood that bad behavior is bad behavior, and the difference between winners and losers doing is is that one&#039;s a diva and the other&#039;s a sore loser, but that they&#039;re both acting badly. Trying to say it&#039;s understood after the fact is being revisionist because no, it is not understood, and shouldn&#039;t be. On the contrary, good or bad behavior is good or bad on its own merits, regardless of the person commiting the behavior. See the PopOffValve blog and other Indycar Tweeters complaining about Dario being a whiner for an example of this; few win more than Dario in Indycar, yet you don&#039;t see the excuse being employed that he&#039;s &quot;earned&quot; that right.

That&#039;s what I meant in my original post: What&#039;s Danica done that&#039;s worse than other drivers? Or other athletes in other sports? None of that context includes the notion of winning being absolution for bad behavior. 

And I&#039;m pointing out the flaws in the argument precisely because I respect the hell out of George, and I know he&#039;s strong enough to handle and respond to legitimate criticism. I love his blog precisely because it&#039;s a carefully thought out and well composed blog; it isn&#039;t mindless idiocy like all too many sports blogs out there are. So because of that, I know that legitimate, logically presented dissent helps strengthen, not weaken discussions occuring within it. That&#039;s why I posted. Not for the sake of nitpickery, but for the sake of correcting a poor analogy. Go to an NFL forum and try to compare Elway to Leaf in the exact manner George did; you&#039;ll get the same response, but with a whole lot of disrespect and derision added. The Leaf/Elway analogy was a bad one for precisely the reason I pointed out: Leaf was a horrid leader who gained no respect from his teammates. Elway was the opposite. That&#039;s the explanatory context right there, not their win/loss records. And that&#039;s why it was not a good response to what I was pointing out.

Dissenting commentary is not a bad thing. Disrespectful posts would be, but I&#039;d hope that I wasn&#039;t coming across as that. On the contrary, I&#039;m being direct because I believe that George can hold his own.

If you thought I was being disrespectful to George, then I apologize to all here because that was not my intent at all. But I&#039;d hope that the objection wasn&#039;t that I was disagreeing with what George said. There&#039;s nothing wrong with disagreement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;m doing is pointing out the problem in George&#8217;s argument. Normally he&#8217;s solid, and I agree with him on most things. As is evidenced by previous comments I&#8217;ve made here. But here, on this one thing, there&#8217;s a definite double standard going. He didn&#8217;t try making the argument that &#8220;winning excuses bratty behavior&#8221; until  someone here dissented, and yes, to be logically consistent, that should have been spelled out. It&#8217;s normally understood that bad behavior is bad behavior, and the difference between winners and losers doing is is that one&#8217;s a diva and the other&#8217;s a sore loser, but that they&#8217;re both acting badly. Trying to say it&#8217;s understood after the fact is being revisionist because no, it is not understood, and shouldn&#8217;t be. On the contrary, good or bad behavior is good or bad on its own merits, regardless of the person commiting the behavior. See the PopOffValve blog and other Indycar Tweeters complaining about Dario being a whiner for an example of this; few win more than Dario in Indycar, yet you don&#8217;t see the excuse being employed that he&#8217;s &#8220;earned&#8221; that right.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I meant in my original post: What&#8217;s Danica done that&#8217;s worse than other drivers? Or other athletes in other sports? None of that context includes the notion of winning being absolution for bad behavior. </p>
<p>And I&#8217;m pointing out the flaws in the argument precisely because I respect the hell out of George, and I know he&#8217;s strong enough to handle and respond to legitimate criticism. I love his blog precisely because it&#8217;s a carefully thought out and well composed blog; it isn&#8217;t mindless idiocy like all too many sports blogs out there are. So because of that, I know that legitimate, logically presented dissent helps strengthen, not weaken discussions occuring within it. That&#8217;s why I posted. Not for the sake of nitpickery, but for the sake of correcting a poor analogy. Go to an NFL forum and try to compare Elway to Leaf in the exact manner George did; you&#8217;ll get the same response, but with a whole lot of disrespect and derision added. The Leaf/Elway analogy was a bad one for precisely the reason I pointed out: Leaf was a horrid leader who gained no respect from his teammates. Elway was the opposite. That&#8217;s the explanatory context right there, not their win/loss records. And that&#8217;s why it was not a good response to what I was pointing out.</p>
<p>Dissenting commentary is not a bad thing. Disrespectful posts would be, but I&#8217;d hope that I wasn&#8217;t coming across as that. On the contrary, I&#8217;m being direct because I believe that George can hold his own.</p>
<p>If you thought I was being disrespectful to George, then I apologize to all here because that was not my intent at all. But I&#8217;d hope that the objection wasn&#8217;t that I was disagreeing with what George said. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with disagreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Garfunkel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude-was it really necessary for George to spell out that winning  can excuse certain behaviours? Somewhere in there, I would think common sense and the understanding of the obvious is the responsibility of the reader.

I&#039;ve always found this site to be a cut above most, because the readership seems to be more level-headed and intelligent than what you find on the &quot;hater sites&quot;. George seems to assume that most readers &quot;get&quot; certain things and doesn&#039;t need to spell things out. One thing that I get is if Danica had proven herself as a consistent winner instead of a consistent whiner, fans would have forgiven her behavior.

You seem to enjoy picking apart every analogy George has tried to make. Try taking those &quot;skills&quot; over to Track Forum and leave this site to those that understand the points that George was trying to make.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude-was it really necessary for George to spell out that winning  can excuse certain behaviours? Somewhere in there, I would think common sense and the understanding of the obvious is the responsibility of the reader.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always found this site to be a cut above most, because the readership seems to be more level-headed and intelligent than what you find on the &#8220;hater sites&#8221;. George seems to assume that most readers &#8220;get&#8221; certain things and doesn&#8217;t need to spell things out. One thing that I get is if Danica had proven herself as a consistent winner instead of a consistent whiner, fans would have forgiven her behavior.</p>
<p>You seem to enjoy picking apart every analogy George has tried to make. Try taking those &#8220;skills&#8221; over to Track Forum and leave this site to those that understand the points that George was trying to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.M.H.</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8846</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.M.H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 06:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you show me where in your article above you noted that Danica&#039;s behavior was wrong because she hadn&#039;t won enough? It appeared to me that her behavior was being characterized as wrong due to its own merits.

-----

Ps. Just to clarify: I wasn&#039;t suggesting that you were engaging in a *male/female* double standard. I do agree that your critique of her is entirely free of gender considerations. My apologies if that wasn&#039;t clear.

PPs. When Elway - and Manning in current times - yelled at a player, it&#039;s leadership because it&#039;s *constructive* i.e. it&#039;s to get them back on track. Whereas Leaf was known to have acted in a very destructive manner towards his teammates, and didn&#039;t yell to straighten  them out, but rather to vent frustration and belittle them. My point here is that you cannot say that Leaf&#039;s activities made him a &quot;brat&quot; because of his win/loss record; the reality is that he was a brat, period, and his behavior was poor leadership due to inherent characteristics, not because they were filtered through a lens of a losing NFL career. It&#039;s not really accurate to say that Elway gets a pass due to his record when Leaf doesn&#039;t because Leaf&#039;s actions towards his teammates were nowhere near being comparable to Elway&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you show me where in your article above you noted that Danica&#8217;s behavior was wrong because she hadn&#8217;t won enough? It appeared to me that her behavior was being characterized as wrong due to its own merits.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Ps. Just to clarify: I wasn&#8217;t suggesting that you were engaging in a *male/female* double standard. I do agree that your critique of her is entirely free of gender considerations. My apologies if that wasn&#8217;t clear.</p>
<p>PPs. When Elway &#8211; and Manning in current times &#8211; yelled at a player, it&#8217;s leadership because it&#8217;s *constructive* i.e. it&#8217;s to get them back on track. Whereas Leaf was known to have acted in a very destructive manner towards his teammates, and didn&#8217;t yell to straighten  them out, but rather to vent frustration and belittle them. My point here is that you cannot say that Leaf&#8217;s activities made him a &#8220;brat&#8221; because of his win/loss record; the reality is that he was a brat, period, and his behavior was poor leadership due to inherent characteristics, not because they were filtered through a lens of a losing NFL career. It&#8217;s not really accurate to say that Elway gets a pass due to his record when Leaf doesn&#8217;t because Leaf&#8217;s actions towards his teammates were nowhere near being comparable to Elway&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMc</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnMc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the way, folks, what George said about Danica&#039;s boorish behavior to the special needs kids was true. I never have commented on that for reasons of my own, but since George brought it up I will. Danica knew what she was dealing with when those kids with excited, lit-up faces at seeing thier favorite driver ran to her. When that happened I whispered to George &quot;did you catch that?&quot; Look, I know that the celebrity/pro athlete can be mobbed, but this was a Friday at Birmingham, the paddock wasn&#039;t that crowded with fans and these were special needs kids who only wanted nothing more than an autograph. Frankly, it is too bad that those kids weren&#039;t fans of Scott Dixon, Ryan Brisco, Graham Rahal or RHR because they would have been in for a treat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, folks, what George said about Danica&#8217;s boorish behavior to the special needs kids was true. I never have commented on that for reasons of my own, but since George brought it up I will. Danica knew what she was dealing with when those kids with excited, lit-up faces at seeing thier favorite driver ran to her. When that happened I whispered to George &#8220;did you catch that?&#8221; Look, I know that the celebrity/pro athlete can be mobbed, but this was a Friday at Birmingham, the paddock wasn&#8217;t that crowded with fans and these were special needs kids who only wanted nothing more than an autograph. Frankly, it is too bad that those kids weren&#8217;t fans of Scott Dixon, Ryan Brisco, Graham Rahal or RHR because they would have been in for a treat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redcar</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[redcar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It occurs to me that Nascar knows the obvious.  For the die-hard followers, new cars and engines and all that fun stuff is so important--but the casual sports fan just wants to see Dale Jr. win a race or anybody beat Kurt Busch.  The car doesn&#039;t matter.

Sports is about choosing a side and supporting your team.  Giving fans someone to cheer for.  That is why Nascar wants Danica.  And that&#039;s an area Indycar seems to be lacking in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurs to me that Nascar knows the obvious.  For the die-hard followers, new cars and engines and all that fun stuff is so important&#8211;but the casual sports fan just wants to see Dale Jr. win a race or anybody beat Kurt Busch.  The car doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>Sports is about choosing a side and supporting your team.  Giving fans someone to cheer for.  That is why Nascar wants Danica.  And that&#8217;s an area Indycar seems to be lacking in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkipinSC</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkipinSC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote a piece on this subject back in August. 

http://justathought-skip-sc.blogspot.com/2011/08/ok-so-shes-leaving-what-now.html

(Insert your snarky &quot;shameless self-promotion&quot; comment here.)

I understand those of other opinions, but unless &quot;Smoke&quot; decides to run her at Charlotte, I expect we&#039;ll see her at Indy in May. In fact, the thing that those of us who follow the series want most (the new cars) is also the thing that might keep her away.

I can tell you this: Although she was booed during driver introductions at Indy this year, the reaction was far different when she took the lead in the waning laps of the race. And, as I said in my earlier comment, she still &quot;moves the needle.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a piece on this subject back in August. </p>
<p><a href="http://justathought-skip-sc.blogspot.com/2011/08/ok-so-shes-leaving-what-now.html" rel="nofollow">http://justathought-skip-sc.blogspot.com/2011/08/ok-so-shes-leaving-what-now.html</a></p>
<p>(Insert your snarky &#8220;shameless self-promotion&#8221; comment here.)</p>
<p>I understand those of other opinions, but unless &#8220;Smoke&#8221; decides to run her at Charlotte, I expect we&#8217;ll see her at Indy in May. In fact, the thing that those of us who follow the series want most (the new cars) is also the thing that might keep her away.</p>
<p>I can tell you this: Although she was booed during driver introductions at Indy this year, the reaction was far different when she took the lead in the waning laps of the race. And, as I said in my earlier comment, she still &#8220;moves the needle.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rice</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Rice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 05:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope you&#039;re wrong...but along the lines of the publicity it might bring the series, I guess that wouldn&#039;t be a bad thing if it were to happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you&#8217;re wrong&#8230;but along the lines of the publicity it might bring the series, I guess that wouldn&#8217;t be a bad thing if it were to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve K</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 05:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She will be back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She will be back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redcar</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[redcar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 04:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2011/10/07/are-we-really-glad-to-see-danica-go/#comment-8838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny,  Geek.  Not so much for Mrs. Geek, but funny...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny,  Geek.  Not so much for Mrs. Geek, but funny&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
