<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best To Never Win The Indianapolis 500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/</link>
	<description>Speed is Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 08:02:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Aikens</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-7631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George Aikens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 12:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-7631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not my desire to comment on the drivers, but and however to be an advocate of the term &quot;have to&quot;.  This term is over used in our American language and must be replaced with the accurate terminology &quot;MUST&quot; and &quot;REQUIRES&quot; or the term that would be most suitable for your sentence. Please in the future observe the over use of &quot;have to&quot; in others&#039; writings and your own and replace with the necessary correct word.
Thank you!
George Aikens]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not my desire to comment on the drivers, but and however to be an advocate of the term &#8220;have to&#8221;.  This term is over used in our American language and must be replaced with the accurate terminology &#8220;MUST&#8221; and &#8220;REQUIRES&#8221; or the term that would be most suitable for your sentence. Please in the future observe the over use of &#8220;have to&#8221; in others&#8217; writings and your own and replace with the necessary correct word.<br />
Thank you!<br />
George Aikens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 15:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I voted for Rex but was also torn between him or Ted Horn.  With 9 finishes in the top 5, makes me wonder what would have happened in the 1949 500 if he hadn&#039;t been killed at Duquoin in 1948.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted for Rex but was also torn between him or Ted Horn.  With 9 finishes in the top 5, makes me wonder what would have happened in the 1949 500 if he hadn&#8217;t been killed at Duquoin in 1948.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would vote for Paul Tracy.  He&#039;s a CART champion (when all the good drivers where there) and Tony George robbed him of a win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would vote for Paul Tracy.  He&#8217;s a CART champion (when all the good drivers where there) and Tony George robbed him of a win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmie Carter</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmie Carter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 19:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bst guy who never won Indy was Perter Revson]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bst guy who never won Indy was Perter Revson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TLV</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TLV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 12:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I look at this a bit differently. I look at overall talented drivers rather than those that have tried at Indy numerous times. I&#039;d have to say the top of that list is Tony Stewart. As much as I dislike him as a driver, the guy has talent - and this was proven in an Indy car. Robbie Gordon as well - all the talent in the world, and can driver in numerous cars in many different series.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I look at this a bit differently. I look at overall talented drivers rather than those that have tried at Indy numerous times. I&#8217;d have to say the top of that list is Tony Stewart. As much as I dislike him as a driver, the guy has talent &#8211; and this was proven in an Indy car. Robbie Gordon as well &#8211; all the talent in the world, and can driver in numerous cars in many different series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Silver</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Silver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 19:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for voting for Ted Horn. I was torn between him and Rex Mays.  You&#039;re right Horn was amazing at the Speedway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for voting for Ted Horn. I was torn between him and Rex Mays.  You&#8217;re right Horn was amazing at the Speedway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim in Wilmington</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim in Wilmington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 18:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure how you reached that conclusion since I&#039;m 60 and I voted.  However, I agree that Harry Hartz would be a worthy addition as would Lou Moore and Jack mcGrath.

Jim]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how you reached that conclusion since I&#8217;m 60 and I voted.  However, I agree that Harry Hartz would be a worthy addition as would Lou Moore and Jack mcGrath.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PC</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to modify the topic, but those whose Indy greatness was screwed by the split... Tracy, Zanardi, Seabass. Maybe Vasser too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to modify the topic, but those whose Indy greatness was screwed by the split&#8230; Tracy, Zanardi, Seabass. Maybe Vasser too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy Racer</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cowboy Racer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My vote is for Ted Horn.  His record at Indy is unbelievable.  Nine straight top 4 finishes and completed every lap except 1 in those years while leading 97.  Not only that, he had 24 other Indy Car Wins ranking him 14th on the all time win list (tied with Bobby Rahal) and won the national championship 3 straight years from 1946-1948.

Another driver that probably should be mentioned is Paul Tracy, although I am not much of a fan.  He does have 31 Indy Car wins ranking him 7th on the all time win list.  Kind of funny that I would mention him since he couldn’t even qualify for this year’s race.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vote is for Ted Horn.  His record at Indy is unbelievable.  Nine straight top 4 finishes and completed every lap except 1 in those years while leading 97.  Not only that, he had 24 other Indy Car Wins ranking him 14th on the all time win list (tied with Bobby Rahal) and won the national championship 3 straight years from 1946-1948.</p>
<p>Another driver that probably should be mentioned is Paul Tracy, although I am not much of a fan.  He does have 31 Indy Car wins ranking him 7th on the all time win list.  Kind of funny that I would mention him since he couldn’t even qualify for this year’s race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/the-best-to-never-win-the-indianapolis-500/#comment-4055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See, I would judge by drivers&#039; total careers and not just what they did at Indianapolis.  Dan Gurney easily gets my vote because he was one of the most versatile drivers ever.  His stats are fine, by the way, two seconds and a third.  I would say most of the drivers on that list don&#039;t have that.  Even Michael Andretti doesn&#039;t have that and he&#039;s had a much longer career, and Gurney was racing in a more competitive era.

I wouldn&#039;t really argue any of the names you put on that list except Scott Goodyear (and I can&#039;t believe someone has voted for Goodyear but no one has voted for Horn yet).  That one I TOTALLY disagree with.  Let&#039;s look at his three near-misses in more detail:

1992 - Goodyear misses the race and only gets into the field when his teammate Mike Groff is pulled for him via team orders.  Then he finishes second (by the way, in a VERY attrition-heavy race.)

1995 - Goodyear has BY FAR the best car on the track (a Reynard-Honda-Firestone when all three of those were ALREADY superior to their rival manufacturers, which would become readily apparent in post-split CART) and makes the stupidest brain fade in Indy history.  No, the best car doesn&#039;t always win, but when say Michael Andretti had the best car he tended to have mechanical failures.  His problems were not self-inflicted.

1997 - This was a very, very, VERY weak field with Luyendyk and Lazier the only past winners, and Treadway had the best equipment at Indianapolis once again as evidenced by their 1-2 finish.  He should have finished where he did finish.  Had he not, he would have choked.

Considering I like to evaluate entire careers when answering this question, it makes Goodyear look even worse.  He won 2 CART races in the glory years, yes, but they both came at Michigan, the track where talent probably matters least and car most (basically the winner is whoever has the best car that doesn&#039;t blow up, every time).  He only had a couple top ten finishes in CART points.  Etc...  And although he showed better in the IRL, how many real drivers was he competing against?  Tony Stewart, Kenny Brack, Buddy Lazier, Arie Luyendyk, and...?  And I admit I find Scott Goodyear REALLY annoying as an announcer.  When hiring a driver as a commentator, either you want to pick a legend whose arrogance is at least justified by results (i.e. Bobby Unser, Darrell Waltrip), a legend who is actually a nice guy (i.e. Arie Luyendyk, Benny Parsons), or a mediocrity who has a good sense of humor about himself (Jon Beekhuis, Wally Dallenbach).  Goodyear is the worst of both worlds in that he is actually an arrogant mediocrity.

There are lots of people I&#039;d list over Goodyear.  Among them I would list, in addition to those on your list:

Bobby Allison
Alberto Ascari
Tony Bettenhausen
Sébastien Bourdais
Jack Brabham
Dan Gurney
Hurley Haywood
Al Holbert
Denny Hulme
Steve Kinser
Joe Leonard
Nigel Mansell
Roger McCluskey
Nelson Piquet
Tim Richmond
Jochen Rindt
Jackie Stewart
Tony Stewart
Paul Tracy
Jimmy Vasser
Cale Yarborough

Yes, I know MOST of those guys are primarily legends in some other form of racing, but I feel every single person on that list has made a bigger impact in racing in general than Goodyear has, and quite a few of these in my opinion have also made a bigger impact on the Speedway, and most of them have at least had a few good runs there, even if their careers there have been short.  Goodyear, by contrast, has taken several of the best cars on the Speedway and underachieved with them (I&#039;ll grant that 1992 he did not have the second best car, but he shouldn&#039;t have been in the field anyway...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I would judge by drivers&#8217; total careers and not just what they did at Indianapolis.  Dan Gurney easily gets my vote because he was one of the most versatile drivers ever.  His stats are fine, by the way, two seconds and a third.  I would say most of the drivers on that list don&#8217;t have that.  Even Michael Andretti doesn&#8217;t have that and he&#8217;s had a much longer career, and Gurney was racing in a more competitive era.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t really argue any of the names you put on that list except Scott Goodyear (and I can&#8217;t believe someone has voted for Goodyear but no one has voted for Horn yet).  That one I TOTALLY disagree with.  Let&#8217;s look at his three near-misses in more detail:</p>
<p>1992 &#8211; Goodyear misses the race and only gets into the field when his teammate Mike Groff is pulled for him via team orders.  Then he finishes second (by the way, in a VERY attrition-heavy race.)</p>
<p>1995 &#8211; Goodyear has BY FAR the best car on the track (a Reynard-Honda-Firestone when all three of those were ALREADY superior to their rival manufacturers, which would become readily apparent in post-split CART) and makes the stupidest brain fade in Indy history.  No, the best car doesn&#8217;t always win, but when say Michael Andretti had the best car he tended to have mechanical failures.  His problems were not self-inflicted.</p>
<p>1997 &#8211; This was a very, very, VERY weak field with Luyendyk and Lazier the only past winners, and Treadway had the best equipment at Indianapolis once again as evidenced by their 1-2 finish.  He should have finished where he did finish.  Had he not, he would have choked.</p>
<p>Considering I like to evaluate entire careers when answering this question, it makes Goodyear look even worse.  He won 2 CART races in the glory years, yes, but they both came at Michigan, the track where talent probably matters least and car most (basically the winner is whoever has the best car that doesn&#8217;t blow up, every time).  He only had a couple top ten finishes in CART points.  Etc&#8230;  And although he showed better in the IRL, how many real drivers was he competing against?  Tony Stewart, Kenny Brack, Buddy Lazier, Arie Luyendyk, and&#8230;?  And I admit I find Scott Goodyear REALLY annoying as an announcer.  When hiring a driver as a commentator, either you want to pick a legend whose arrogance is at least justified by results (i.e. Bobby Unser, Darrell Waltrip), a legend who is actually a nice guy (i.e. Arie Luyendyk, Benny Parsons), or a mediocrity who has a good sense of humor about himself (Jon Beekhuis, Wally Dallenbach).  Goodyear is the worst of both worlds in that he is actually an arrogant mediocrity.</p>
<p>There are lots of people I&#8217;d list over Goodyear.  Among them I would list, in addition to those on your list:</p>
<p>Bobby Allison<br />
Alberto Ascari<br />
Tony Bettenhausen<br />
Sébastien Bourdais<br />
Jack Brabham<br />
Dan Gurney<br />
Hurley Haywood<br />
Al Holbert<br />
Denny Hulme<br />
Steve Kinser<br />
Joe Leonard<br />
Nigel Mansell<br />
Roger McCluskey<br />
Nelson Piquet<br />
Tim Richmond<br />
Jochen Rindt<br />
Jackie Stewart<br />
Tony Stewart<br />
Paul Tracy<br />
Jimmy Vasser<br />
Cale Yarborough</p>
<p>Yes, I know MOST of those guys are primarily legends in some other form of racing, but I feel every single person on that list has made a bigger impact in racing in general than Goodyear has, and quite a few of these in my opinion have also made a bigger impact on the Speedway, and most of them have at least had a few good runs there, even if their careers there have been short.  Goodyear, by contrast, has taken several of the best cars on the Speedway and underachieved with them (I&#8217;ll grant that 1992 he did not have the second best car, but he shouldn&#8217;t have been in the field anyway&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
