<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Closer Look At This Past Weekend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/</link>
	<description>Speed is Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:07:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve heard a lot of commentators say that the Penske and Ganassi teams guessed the car setup right while the others didn&#039;t.  To me that highlights the biggest problem with the race weekend: there was no race trim practice session at the same time of day as the race.  No wonder teams with lesser resources were lapped.  I thought the race was good, but having a few non-championship drivers contending for the win would have spiced it up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard a lot of commentators say that the Penske and Ganassi teams guessed the car setup right while the others didn&#8217;t.  To me that highlights the biggest problem with the race weekend: there was no race trim practice session at the same time of day as the race.  No wonder teams with lesser resources were lapped.  I thought the race was good, but having a few non-championship drivers contending for the win would have spiced it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THANK YOU, George!  I am so glad to actually have someone write an intelligent article about IndyCar racing. It&#039;s why I love your blog more than any other.

I also found the race exciting. While  there were no passes for the lead every lap-the way some think is exciting-the race ws exciting because it was both a physical battle between Briscoe, Dixon and Franchitti on the track and their teams in the pit lane.  All of which is excitng to those of us who truly understand things beyond superficiality, which sadly is not many.  I also agree with your analogy to baseball. If you truly understand the esoterics of the sport, you find everything exciting. Unfortunately, some don&#039;t even know the meaing of &quot;Esoteric&quot; or anything beyond simplicity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU, George!  I am so glad to actually have someone write an intelligent article about IndyCar racing. It&#8217;s why I love your blog more than any other.</p>
<p>I also found the race exciting. While  there were no passes for the lead every lap-the way some think is exciting-the race ws exciting because it was both a physical battle between Briscoe, Dixon and Franchitti on the track and their teams in the pit lane.  All of which is excitng to those of us who truly understand things beyond superficiality, which sadly is not many.  I also agree with your analogy to baseball. If you truly understand the esoterics of the sport, you find everything exciting. Unfortunately, some don&#8217;t even know the meaing of &#8220;Esoteric&#8221; or anything beyond simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indygrrl</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[indygrrl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why didn&#039;t they have a random caution that screwed up Briscoe at Texas? He was leading by a 7 seconds--I find it hard to believe that there was no random debris at Homestead after 200 laps. I am a Briscoe fan and, yes, he screwed up at Motegi, but it seems like there are a lot of &quot;forces&quot; against him. I hope to see him win the championship next year. 
Yes, baseball is boring...zzzzzz]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t they have a random caution that screwed up Briscoe at Texas? He was leading by a 7 seconds&#8211;I find it hard to believe that there was no random debris at Homestead after 200 laps. I am a Briscoe fan and, yes, he screwed up at Motegi, but it seems like there are a lot of &#8220;forces&#8221; against him. I hope to see him win the championship next year.<br />
Yes, baseball is boring&#8230;zzzzzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesO</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did enjoy the race up front--I thought Dixon had it sewn up and then Briscoe overtook him--I realized it wasn&#039;t going to be one of those bores where Dixon (or whomever) gets in front and that&#039;s the end of it.

But I was apalled by the 3 lapping the entire field so early.  That seemed to be the summary for the entire season.  It&#039;s hard to get excited about young guns like Rahal or RHR or Barrett--even Danica or Kanaan--when you realize they have no chance of winning unless a hideous wreck wipes out the four Penske/Ganassi cars.

It&#039;s not a great metaphor but I&#039;ll use it anyway: it felt like watching a Super Bowl where the game is a blow-out, and you&#039;re not watching to see who wins, you&#039;re just watching to see who&#039;ll be the MVP.  To me, that doesn&#039;t carry the same level of excitement or interest.

So even though the race up front was great and I&#039;m happy Dario won (and I don&#039;t give a S--- about fuel management; Dixon and Briscoe just managed their fuel differently); but as a race I thought it was forgettable, and as a season I thought it was lackluster.

I tell my friends this: the reason I love the Indy 500 is that it&#039;s unpredictable.  Sometimes the guy on the pole wins, but usually he doesn&#039;t.   A lot of the favorites don&#039;t even finish.   So while Penske, Ganassi do well at the 500 too, it&#039;s not  a done deal.   The IRL season felt like a done deal.   They could have parked the rest of the field and gotten the same result.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did enjoy the race up front&#8211;I thought Dixon had it sewn up and then Briscoe overtook him&#8211;I realized it wasn&#8217;t going to be one of those bores where Dixon (or whomever) gets in front and that&#8217;s the end of it.</p>
<p>But I was apalled by the 3 lapping the entire field so early.  That seemed to be the summary for the entire season.  It&#8217;s hard to get excited about young guns like Rahal or RHR or Barrett&#8211;even Danica or Kanaan&#8211;when you realize they have no chance of winning unless a hideous wreck wipes out the four Penske/Ganassi cars.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a great metaphor but I&#8217;ll use it anyway: it felt like watching a Super Bowl where the game is a blow-out, and you&#8217;re not watching to see who wins, you&#8217;re just watching to see who&#8217;ll be the MVP.  To me, that doesn&#8217;t carry the same level of excitement or interest.</p>
<p>So even though the race up front was great and I&#8217;m happy Dario won (and I don&#8217;t give a S&#8212; about fuel management; Dixon and Briscoe just managed their fuel differently); but as a race I thought it was forgettable, and as a season I thought it was lackluster.</p>
<p>I tell my friends this: the reason I love the Indy 500 is that it&#8217;s unpredictable.  Sometimes the guy on the pole wins, but usually he doesn&#8217;t.   A lot of the favorites don&#8217;t even finish.   So while Penske, Ganassi do well at the 500 too, it&#8217;s not  a done deal.   The IRL season felt like a done deal.   They could have parked the rest of the field and gotten the same result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Speedgeek</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Speedgeek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Menard&#039;s driver (Herm Johnson, I presume? And if so, how&#039;s the weather in Eau Claire today?),
Could you provide a link to the Homestead TV ratings? That sounds preposterously low. From my quick search, the Motegi race drew a 0.14, which everybody knew would be horrendous in advance (series had been off for 3 weeks, 10:30 PM start time, track that doesn&#039;t lend itself to wheel to wheel). I&#039;m not calling you a liar, that number just doesn&#039;t make any sense to me. If Motegi got a 0.14 (translating to 165,000 homes), then you&#039;re telling me that the Homestead race drew less than 118,000 homes? If that&#039;s true, then we&#039;ve got a real problem, but I just want some proof.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Menard&#8217;s driver (Herm Johnson, I presume? And if so, how&#8217;s the weather in Eau Claire today?),<br />
Could you provide a link to the Homestead TV ratings? That sounds preposterously low. From my quick search, the Motegi race drew a 0.14, which everybody knew would be horrendous in advance (series had been off for 3 weeks, 10:30 PM start time, track that doesn&#8217;t lend itself to wheel to wheel). I&#8217;m not calling you a liar, that number just doesn&#8217;t make any sense to me. If Motegi got a 0.14 (translating to 165,000 homes), then you&#8217;re telling me that the Homestead race drew less than 118,000 homes? If that&#8217;s true, then we&#8217;ve got a real problem, but I just want some proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian McKay</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian McKay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from the Silent Pagoda, early 2008: 
&quot;There was E.J. Viso taking out Tomas Sheckter, causing both to spin wildly through six acres of lush grassland. I mean, let’s not kid ourselves: seeing a pair of 700-horsepower cars tear through a finely manicured lawn somehow taps into the juvenile delinquent in all of us. It was the world’s greatest synchronized lawn job. And it was glorious.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the Silent Pagoda, early 2008:<br />
&#8220;There was E.J. Viso taking out Tomas Sheckter, causing both to spin wildly through six acres of lush grassland. I mean, let’s not kid ourselves: seeing a pair of 700-horsepower cars tear through a finely manicured lawn somehow taps into the juvenile delinquent in all of us. It was the world’s greatest synchronized lawn job. And it was glorious.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Menard's driver</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Menard's driver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Homestead race drew LESS then a .1 rating 

And that kind of race won&#039;t help things.

The top 3 cars/drivers made everybody else look like they were driving Atlantics cars.

Good for them and their teams.  But that won&#039;t &quot;play&quot; in 2009 and its obvious most of what Indy Car is doing nowadays has turned OFF a bunch of people (and continues to turn off more and more people every year).

I am glad that some people enjoyed that race on Saturday.  I am glad some of you actually could still watch it on your TV cable package.  But just understand (as good fan Pressdog pointed out earlier here) that many were bored with that race and bored with most of the season.  Just very little interesting with those 3 particular drivers and the same 2 teams winning almost every race.  Just way, way too predictable.  Predictability isn&#039;t all that interesting.  Knowing before the green flag on the season starts, who the top 4 cars are going to be (which you could do this year), isn&#039;t exciting stuff. 

Maybe 2010 will be better.  It almost has to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Homestead race drew LESS then a .1 rating </p>
<p>And that kind of race won&#8217;t help things.</p>
<p>The top 3 cars/drivers made everybody else look like they were driving Atlantics cars.</p>
<p>Good for them and their teams.  But that won&#8217;t &#8220;play&#8221; in 2009 and its obvious most of what Indy Car is doing nowadays has turned OFF a bunch of people (and continues to turn off more and more people every year).</p>
<p>I am glad that some people enjoyed that race on Saturday.  I am glad some of you actually could still watch it on your TV cable package.  But just understand (as good fan Pressdog pointed out earlier here) that many were bored with that race and bored with most of the season.  Just very little interesting with those 3 particular drivers and the same 2 teams winning almost every race.  Just way, way too predictable.  Predictability isn&#8217;t all that interesting.  Knowing before the green flag on the season starts, who the top 4 cars are going to be (which you could do this year), isn&#8217;t exciting stuff. </p>
<p>Maybe 2010 will be better.  It almost has to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh O'Gorman</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh O'Gorman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey George,
To be honest I actually enjoyed the race too - it was the constant tension and the ongoing battle between Dixon and Briscoe had me pacing up and down during the race, and there was always the lurking Dario.

...and Dario was not that far ahead when Dixon and Briscoe pitted.  Yes, it probably would&#039;ve been more climactic had the other two come out closer to him following their stops or if Dario had a litre less fuel, but in fairness Franchitti played it exactly right.  Like Briscoe and Dixon, Dario has had a fantastic season and thoroughly deserved the title.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey George,<br />
To be honest I actually enjoyed the race too &#8211; it was the constant tension and the ongoing battle between Dixon and Briscoe had me pacing up and down during the race, and there was always the lurking Dario.</p>
<p>&#8230;and Dario was not that far ahead when Dixon and Briscoe pitted.  Yes, it probably would&#8217;ve been more climactic had the other two come out closer to him following their stops or if Dario had a litre less fuel, but in fairness Franchitti played it exactly right.  Like Briscoe and Dixon, Dario has had a fantastic season and thoroughly deserved the title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Speedgeek</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Speedgeek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with you, George. Personally, I thought that Saturday&#039;s race was pretty &quot;old school&quot;, a la the way a lot of CART races used to play out in the early-&#039;90s. You&#039;d have a tricky track (or, at least, cars that were somewhat difficult to dial in and control on that week&#039;s track), 2-3 guys who nailed the setup, and a couple of disparate strategies allowed to play out (or not, sometimes you get screwed by a yellow). THAT&#039;s what got me interested in the sport, not wheel-to-wheel racing, which has really only become more common in ANY type of racing, NASCAR included, in the last 10-12 years. Mind you, I&#039;m a weirdo in that mindset (check that username again), but that&#039;s how I felt.

Richmond sucked because NOBODY could pass, leaders included, even when they approached backmarkers. It was almost, quite literally, a parade. On the other hand, there was plenty of passing to be had at Homestead, though I do wish that Versus had shown a bit more of the rest of the field. Versus had a fantastic first season, but between almost completely ignoring 20 of the 23 cars on the track and 12 (give or take one, I lost count) commercial breaks during an 88 minute race, this was not their strongest showing. It&#039;s certainly something to build on for next year, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you, George. Personally, I thought that Saturday&#8217;s race was pretty &#8220;old school&#8221;, a la the way a lot of CART races used to play out in the early-&#8217;90s. You&#8217;d have a tricky track (or, at least, cars that were somewhat difficult to dial in and control on that week&#8217;s track), 2-3 guys who nailed the setup, and a couple of disparate strategies allowed to play out (or not, sometimes you get screwed by a yellow). THAT&#8217;s what got me interested in the sport, not wheel-to-wheel racing, which has really only become more common in ANY type of racing, NASCAR included, in the last 10-12 years. Mind you, I&#8217;m a weirdo in that mindset (check that username again), but that&#8217;s how I felt.</p>
<p>Richmond sucked because NOBODY could pass, leaders included, even when they approached backmarkers. It was almost, quite literally, a parade. On the other hand, there was plenty of passing to be had at Homestead, though I do wish that Versus had shown a bit more of the rest of the field. Versus had a fantastic first season, but between almost completely ignoring 20 of the 23 cars on the track and 12 (give or take one, I lost count) commercial breaks during an 88 minute race, this was not their strongest showing. It&#8217;s certainly something to build on for next year, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian McKay</title>
		<link>http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian McKay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/a-closer-look-at-this-past-weekend/#comment-1349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like: &quot;knowing your limitations and maximizing your strengths&quot;
Incidentally, a friend reminds me every few months that spectators watch races to see crashes. At first, two years ago, I disbelieved that. Eventually, after reading alot of race reports and blogs and forums and talking with disinterested spectators who may tune-in for the Daytona 500 or Indy 500, fans of 3 NAPCAR series and IndyCar fans, I came around to the idea that millions of TV viewers may tune-in to see commotion or mayhem or accidents which may include minor or major crashes. Supposedly the &#039;average American&#039; spectator sees oval-track racing as modern gladiatorial battle. The words &quot;battle&quot; and &quot;fight&quot; are used endlessly by the on-air commentators, and many spins, slides and crashes occur. 
  So if the Homestead race didn&#039;t feature one&#039;s favorite driver &quot;battling&quot; for a podium finish or a big, Hollywood-movie-style crash, a la NAPCAR, it was boring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like: &#8220;knowing your limitations and maximizing your strengths&#8221;<br />
Incidentally, a friend reminds me every few months that spectators watch races to see crashes. At first, two years ago, I disbelieved that. Eventually, after reading alot of race reports and blogs and forums and talking with disinterested spectators who may tune-in for the Daytona 500 or Indy 500, fans of 3 NAPCAR series and IndyCar fans, I came around to the idea that millions of TV viewers may tune-in to see commotion or mayhem or accidents which may include minor or major crashes. Supposedly the &#8216;average American&#8217; spectator sees oval-track racing as modern gladiatorial battle. The words &#8220;battle&#8221; and &#8220;fight&#8221; are used endlessly by the on-air commentators, and many spins, slides and crashes occur.<br />
  So if the Homestead race didn&#8217;t feature one&#8217;s favorite driver &#8220;battling&#8221; for a podium finish or a big, Hollywood-movie-style crash, a la NAPCAR, it was boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
